After a prosecution that spanned 11 weeks and had its percentage of bombshells, the defence case on the U.S. trial of Mexican drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman clocked in on Tuesday at a trifling 30 mins.
Legal professional Jeffrey Lichtman known as one witness and entered one file into proof earlier than resting the defence’s case. The jury was once despatched house for the day with ultimate arguments set to start on Wednesday.
Guzman may just face lifestyles in jail if convicted of drug and homicide conspiracy fees that his legal professionals say are fabricated.
It is not exceptional for defence legal professionals to name few and even no witnesses. However Guzman’s fleeting defence was once placing as it adopted a sweeping one via the federal government that featured 56 witnesses, together with vibrant co-operators who described how the infamous boss of the Sinaloa cartel ran his cocaine-dealing empire with an iron fist.
There have been stories of Guzman working bare thru an underground tunnel to evade a manhunt, of hefty money bribes to most sensible Mexican executive and army officers and of the defendant in my view torturing and assassinating his enemies in suits of rage.
Prosecutors described the proof as overwhelming, noting in a court docket submitting Monday that it incorporated witness testimony, textual content messages, recorded calls, drug seizures and handwritten letters that the federal government says end up Guzman “was once a member of a narcotics conspiracy as probably the most leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel.”
Against this, jurors watched Lichtman in brief query an FBI agent a couple of 2017 debriefing of one among Guzman’s cocaine providers — executive witness Jorge Cifuentes — who has given moving accounts about his declare U.S. intelligence officer as soon as printed delicate investigative data with him.
It seemed to be an effort to each assault Cifuentes’ credibility and give a boost to the speculation that Guzman was once the sufferer of a conspiracy via the U.S. and Mexican governments to unmarried him out for prosecution.
All over cross-examinations of prosecution witnesses, defence legal professionals grilled the co-operators about their very own felony backgrounds and the offers they lower with prosecutors that might shorten their sentences.
The legal professionals have claimed that is incentive to border Guzman — some extent this is positive to be a central theme of the defence ultimate argument.